Home
About
Publication
Internship
Assignment Centre
Notes
_Constitution
_Indian Penal Code
_Code of Criminal Procedure
_Civil Procedure Code
_Contract
_Arbitration
Legal Aid
Founder's Block

Contract Law

Coming Soon

0 Comments

Total Pageviews

5594

Report Abuse

Search This Blog

October 202398
September 2023133

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

by Legal Specs

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr. Before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India NAME OF CASE Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr CITATION 2003 SC DATE OF JUDGEMENT 14 th April, 2003 APPELLANT Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd RESPONDENT Jayesh H. Pandya and Anr BENCH/ JUDGE M.B Shah and Arun Kumar STATUTES INVOLVED Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr Before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India INTRODUCTION Referring a case to arbitration where it involves the right of third parties has ...

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

by Legal Specs

TITLE OF THE CASE: MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD CITATION: AIR 1958 PAT 445 COURT: PATNA HIGH COURT BENCH: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.L. UNTWALIA Reputation is an asset to each and every person. Any type of deliberate false communication, either written or spoken, that can harm a person’s reputation or decreases the respect, regard or confidence of a person; or induces disparaging, or a hostile or disagreeable opinion or feeling against a person is known as defamation . Article 19(2) has imposed reasonable exemption to freedom of speech and expression granted under Article 19(1) (a). Contempt of court, defamation and incitement to an offence are some exceptions [1] .The essentials for successful defamation suit are: ■ Statement must be Defamatory ■ Statement must refer to the Plaintiff ■ Statement must be Published ■ ...

KEDARNATH BAJORIA AND Ors. V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

by Legal Specs

KEDARNATH BAJORIA AND Ors. V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL JUDGES: 1. Chief justice M. PatanjaliShastri, 2. B.K. BoseVivian 3.Ghulam Hasan 4. Jagannadhadas B . This case was held on 23 rd may 1953 in Supreme court of India FACTS: The appellants were the owners of the firm, Kedar Nath Mohanlal (firm) which was the managing agent for the Shiva Jute Press Ltd. Some of the godowns of the press were requisitioned by the government for the military purposes including the roofs of Nos. 19 and 20 which form one continuous space and were known as roof No. 20 of the Press. The military was in possession of the roof for 2 years and the charges arose out of the compensation claims made by the appellants to the military regarding the damage caused to the roofs due to the misuse and the damage of jute stock due to rain leaks through damaged roofs. The compensation accounts were calculated by the Area Lands and Hirings Disposals Offic...

Contract Law

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Total Pageviews

Report Abuse

Search This Blog

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

KEDARNATH BAJORIA AND Ors. V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Social Handles

Most Popular

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

RAMCHANDRAM RICE & OIL MILLS LTD. V. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Subscribe Us

Menu Footer Widget

Contact form