Home
About
Publication
Internship
Assignment Centre
Notes
_Constitution
_Indian Penal Code
_Code of Criminal Procedure
_Civil Procedure Code
_Contract
_Arbitration
Legal Aid
Founder's Block

Legal Aid

Legal Drafts

Notes

Moot courts

0 Comments

Total Pageviews

5615

Report Abuse

Search This Blog

October 202398
September 2023133

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

by Legal Specs

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr. Before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India NAME OF CASE Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr CITATION 2003 SC DATE OF JUDGEMENT 14 th April, 2003 APPELLANT Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd RESPONDENT Jayesh H. Pandya and Anr BENCH/ JUDGE M.B Shah and Arun Kumar STATUTES INVOLVED Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr Before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India INTRODUCTION Referring a case to arbitration where it involves the right of third parties has ...

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

by Legal Specs

TITLE OF THE CASE: MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD CITATION: AIR 1958 PAT 445 COURT: PATNA HIGH COURT BENCH: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.L. UNTWALIA Reputation is an asset to each and every person. Any type of deliberate false communication, either written or spoken, that can harm a person’s reputation or decreases the respect, regard or confidence of a person; or induces disparaging, or a hostile or disagreeable opinion or feeling against a person is known as defamation . Article 19(2) has imposed reasonable exemption to freedom of speech and expression granted under Article 19(1) (a). Contempt of court, defamation and incitement to an offence are some exceptions [1] .The essentials for successful defamation suit are: ■ Statement must be Defamatory ■ Statement must refer to the Plaintiff ■ Statement must be Published ■ ...

Daimler co., Ltd v. Continental Tyre and Rubber co. (Great Britain), Ltd.

by Legal Specs

CASE COMMENT: Daimler co., Ltd v. Continental Tyre and Rubber co. (Great Britain), Ltd., 1916 AC 307 Equivalent citation: (1916-1917) All ER Rep. 191 Bench: Earl of Halsbury Viscount Mersey Lord Kinner Lord Atkinson Lord Shaw of Dunfermline Lord Parker of Waddington Lord Sumner Lord Paramour APPELLANT: ……………………………………………………….DAIMLER CO. LTD. RESPONDENT:………………………………..CONTINENTAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. YEAR OF JUDGEMENT: 1916 CITATION: (1916-1917) All ER Rep. 191 INTRODUCTION Under the Companies Act 2013, Company has been defined under Section 2 (20) i.e. company means “a company incorporated under the Companies Act 2013 or under any previous company law”, the formation of a company and its registration is done under this act. The company law doesn't define the strict legal meaning of a company. It has many advantages and a few disadvantages. The most important feature of company law is that it has a “...

Legal Aid

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Total Pageviews

Report Abuse

Search This Blog

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

Daimler co., Ltd v. Continental Tyre and Rubber co. (Great Britain), Ltd.

Social Handles

Most Popular

Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.

MAHENDER RAM V HARNANDAN PRASAD

RAMCHANDRAM RICE & OIL MILLS LTD. V. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Subscribe Us

Menu Footer Widget

Contact form